I believe Henry's protest was a personal success, if not a public one. Though he did not accomplish the goal he had in mind, Henry maintained his morals and did not give in to society, and persevered. However, he was not influential enough to make people change their ways or end the Mexican War. In this sense, his protest was a failure.
There are a few examples of conversations in the book that contain irony. For instance, when Henry and Waldo Emerson are arguing, Waldo does not want to give his entire influence because he doesn't want to incite conflict. And yet, by not taking action, he is only allowing more violence, as Henry said, "I'll...leave you at peace with your war." Also, when Henry is speaking with Williams, Williams desires freedom, yet he likely will not find true freedom. Had he not been killed, he may have been free from most racism, but he would have been captured by society. He would have become trapped by the troubles of humankind. While Henry lives in poor conditions, he insists he has more. Lastly, when Thoreau speaks to Lydian, she seems to think that he is lonely because he doesn't love. In reality, he has learned to love almost everything, but she just cannot see it as it is deeper and different than most relationships she sees.
I believe the most important characters are Henry, Waldo Emerson, and Lydian. My list of actors is extremely limited - what can I say, I'm a PATH student. So, here goes. You may laugh, because I am.
I think Morgan Freeman could possibly play Henry. They both seem thoughtful and could be meditative (or could at least act like it). I think Morgan Freeman could portray someone who stands up for the underdog or unconventional ideas. Tom Selleck might play Waldo. They could be seen as the wise, trusted friend that one such as Henry would look to for advice. Both could make compelling speeches. However, as both are obviously both are not perfect, they may not always act on their words. Lydian could be played by Jane Seymour. Lydian seems sensible and cares about people, and I think Jane could portray that role. Also, she tries to guide Henry to a good, if more conformed, future, and I believe Jane could easily show her as wanting the best for people.
No comments:
Post a Comment